Hebrews

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13

Hebrews 10 – Skeptic's Annotated Bible answered

A response and reply to the notes on Hebrews 10 in the Skeptic's Annotated Bible (SAB).

King James Version

SAB comment

My comment


1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.

2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.

3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.

4 For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.

"It is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins."
If this verse is true, then much of the Old Testament is false.
Does God desire animal sacrifices?
This is a quote from the Old Testament, so a clearly recognised principle in the Old Testament as well. See just verses as Psalm 51:16-17.
The blood of animals was only a sign, a reference to the real thing, to be done until the referred thing had come, as Calvin explains:

The Jews, indeed, had in this a symbol and a pledge of the real cleansing; but it was with reference to another, even as the blood of the calf represented the blood of Christ. But the Apostle is speaking here of the efficacy of the blood of beasts in itself. He therefore justly takes away from it the power of cleansing. There is also to be understood a contrast which is not expressed, as though he had said, “It is no wonder that the ancient sacrifices were insufficient, so that they were to be offered continually, for they had nothing in them but the blood of beasts, which could not reach the conscience; but far otherwise is the power of Christ’s blood: It is not then right to measure the offering which he has made by the former sacrifices.”

5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:

(10:5-6) Misquote of Ps.40:6 which says:
"Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required."
The author quotes here the translation as found in the Septuagint, but the meaning is the same. See also Psalm 40:6.

6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure.

7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

8 Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;

9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

11 And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:

"Sacrifices, which can never take away sins"
Does God desire animal sacrifices?
If it could take away sin, why repeat it? That it had to be repeated, showed that it, in itself, had no efficacy. God appointed animal sacrifices as a sign and reference to the sacrifice of Christ.
But see Lev. 4:20 where the author of the SAB reads a contradiction.

12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;

13 From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool.

14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

15 Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,

16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

17 And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.

18 Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.

19 Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus,

20 By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh;

21 And having an high priest over the house of God;

22 Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.

23 Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;)

24 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works:

"Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works."
I'm not sure the author of the SAB is achieving that with his blog...

25 Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.

26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,

27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.

28 He that despised Moses’ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:

(10:28-29) "He that despised Moses' law died without mercy." Those who disobeyed the Old Testament law were killed without mercy. It will be much worse for those who displease Jesus.
The reference here is to Deut. 17:2-7. What is meant that an accussation by a single person was not valid. The apostle Paul calls this without mercy because there were no exceptions.
But I would like to get to know the opinion of the author of the SAB: what punishment does he think is suitable for those who defame and rail against the Son of God? Who despise him, ignore him, and call God a liar, not believing the testimony he gave of his Son.

29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.

31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

"It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God."
Try to stay away from God because " it is a fearful thing to fall into" his hands.
Should we fear God?
It is a thing to fear to fall into the hands of God as judge. For the other meaning of fear see 2 Tim. 1:7.

32 But call to remembrance the former days, in which, after ye were illuminated, ye endured a great fight of afflictions;

33 Partly, whilst ye were made a gazingstock both by reproaches and afflictions; and partly, whilst ye became companions of them that were so used.

34 For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance.

35 Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompence of reward.

36 For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise.

37 For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.

"For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry."
What the Bible says about the end of the world
The Bible says everywhere the same thing: we live in the last days, and we should live as if Christ were to return at anytime.

38 Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.

"The just shall live by faith."
Has the ever been a just person?

39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.